Review: Taken 3


In the third film about ex-CIA guy Bryan Mills (Liam Neeson), he finds himself on the run from cops (led by Forest Whitaker) after being framed for the murder of someone close to him. Now it’s up to Mills to evade capture, figure out who the real killer is, and bring them to justice, possibly his own ‘specially skilled’ brand. Maggie Grace and Famke Janssen reprise their roles as Kim and Lenore, while Dougray Scott steps into the role of Lenore’s spouse Stuart, previously played by Xander Berkeley. Sam Spruell plays a Russian mobster, whilst Don Harvey and Dylan Bruno play idiot cops. Leland Orser, Jon Gries, and a returning David Warshofsky are back as Mills’ CIA buddies.

 

Director Olivier Megaton (“Taken 2”) and screenwriters Luc Besson and Robert Mark Kamen (the writers of the previous two “Taken” films) correct the course of the ship somewhat after the disastrous “Taken 2” with this 2015 outing. The third, longest, and hopefully last film in the series, this one benefits from more competently shot action, and ripping off a superior story for the most part (“The Fugitive”). I was glad that no one got ‘Taken’ in the kidnapping sense in this one (Neeson apparently wouldn’t sign on unless no one was kidnapped this time), but it’s still just watchable at best for me.

 

We don’t start well, with Maggie Grace yet again playing a character a lot younger than she really (and clearly) is. This time around, she’s graduated from ‘teenager hiding her boyfriend from her dad’ to ‘hiding a possible pregnancy from her dad’. For crying out loud, the actress is in her 30s. Visibly. Also, after seemingly reconciling in the previous film, Liam Neeson and Famke Janssen here are amicable, but not together. Weird. On the plus side, whilst Forest Whitaker is capable of being one of the very best or very worst character actors depending on the day, he’s rock-solid here in a film and role that is clearly beneath him. I mean, it’s such an underdeveloped character, you get the feeling that he’s meant to be an expert cop, but it’s barely dealt with and it plays more like ‘not as dumb as the other dweebs on the force’. His character is surrounded by the biggest Boobs in Blue since the entire cast of the “Police Academy” franchise. These guys are complete dunderheads for the most part, and acting like they’re in a Tony Scott film (think “Enemy of the State”, only not nearly as good) by eavesdropping on a funeral is silly and out-of-place here.

 

It’s probably on about the same level as the first film, but with one villain revealed early on (and due to the plot structure, sidelined for much of the film) and another link in the chain completely obvious from the actor’s first scene (poor direction of the actor in question there), suspense is completely lacking. A big step up in quality from the second film, but that says more about how poor that film was, because this film, like the first film is just tolerable at best. Obviously fans of this kind of thing will want to bump the rating up a little higher. It’s not bad, I guess.

 

Rating: C+

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Hellraiser (2022)

Recovering junkie Odessa A’zion accompanies scuzzy boyfriend Drew Starkey on a break-in where all they find is a weird puzzle box. A’zion later opens the box and after some weird shit happens, A’zion and Starkey figure it might be a good idea to learn more about this messed up trinket. Goran Visnjic plays a millionaire who possessed the box before our protagonist nicked it.   Is there any point in remaking/rebooting “Hellraiser” when the 1987 adaptation of Clive Barker’s original text was written and directed by Barker himself? And is considered a horror classic? On evidence here, absolutely not. Directed by David Bruckner ( “The Signal” ) and scripted by Ben Collins ( “The Night House” ) and Luke Piotrowski (ditto) this is an entirely tedious affair. I took a long time to get on board with the 1987 “Hellraiser” , I have to admit. It was wildly imaginative and original, like a nightmare transplanted on to film. However, the characters were stone cold and left me similarly chilly t
Read more

Review: Boyka: Undisputed

Yuri Boyka (Scott Adkins) is out of prison and fighting for a living, with ambitions for the ‘Most Complete Fighter’ to make a real name for himself. However, after an opponent dies during a fight, the deeply religious Boyka starts to have a crisis of conscience. He tries to make amends with the man’s widow, which eventually pits him against a local gangster (Alon Moni Aboutboul, quite good). Anything with Scott Adkins will generally get me interested, and although this series peaked with the superlative “Undisputed II: Last Man Standing” , this 2017 film from director Todor Chapkanov (director of the SyFy movies “Copperhead” and “Ghost Town” ) is no slouch in a series yet to deliver anything less than solid entertainment. Producer Isaac Florentine is missed in the director’s chair, but Chapkanov gives us at the very least the series’ most dramatically ambitious entry, as Adkins’ ‘most complete fighter’ Yuri Boyka continues on his journey to redemption here. In this one, the
Read more

Review: Ninja 2: Shadow of a Tear

Scott Adkins is once again Casey, an American proponent of the martial art of Ninjutsu. When Casey’s pregnant Japanese wife (Mika Hijii) is rubbed out, he’s on a vengeance mission to find her killers. A friendly face, Nakabara (Kane Kosugi) turns up at the funeral, and suggests Casey come to Thailand to deal with his grief in another country. Casey initially declines, but eventually takes Nakabara up on his offer. However, his wife’s murder still haunts Casey, and with intel supplied by Nakabara, the trail eventually leads Casey to a brutal drug baron named Goro (Shun Sugata).   I was extremely disappointed with the first “Ninja” , but had heard that this 2013 sequel from director Isaac Florentine ( “Undisputed II: Last Man Standing” , “Undisputed III: Redemption” , “Ninja” ) was a damn near masterpiece of the martial-arts action movie genre. Having now finally gotten my hot little hands on it, I’d say the hype is a bit much, but this is unquestionably a much better film than the f
Read more