Review: Man at the Top


Kenneth Haigh plays Joe Lampton, who moves up in the world to take on an executive position working for Harry Andrews’ pharmaceutical company. He even manages to bed the boss’ wife (Nanette Newman) while he’s at it- and is he ever at it! (Had to go there). However, something starts to feel not right with all of this. You see, Joe got the job after his predecessor committed suicide, and it appears that the company’s new wonder drug might not be all it’s cracked up to be. So Joe starts to look into it, well in between boinking Newman and shacking up with a runaway (British TV veteran Angela Bruce) and her friend (Margaret Heald). Clive Swift and John Quentin play a couple of executives, whilst comedian/former soccer play Charlie Williams has a nice (but irrelevant to the plot) cameo as Bruce’s dad.

 

I’ve not seen any of the previous films in this series (“Room at the Top”, “Life at the Top”), read the books, or seen the TV series (also starring Kenneth Haigh) that this 1973 film from director Mike Vardy (a TV director who indeed directed for the same-named series) and screenwriters John Junkin (an actor and TV writer) and Hugh Whitemore (Franco Zeffirelli’s “Jane Eyre”). I’m also not English, and didn’t grow up at the time this film was made or set, so I’m really not the right audience for this film in the slightest. So when I tell you that this seemed like much ado about nothing, bear all of this in mind. You might get a whole lot more out of this than I did, I only watched the thing because it was a Hammer release (and absolutely not typical Hammer fodder, either).

 

Kenneth Haigh isn’t bad in the lead, though I’m not sure why he’s been painted as a pants man, that’s a little bit of a stretch. He’s got a face like a busted arse (takes one to know one), and isn’t that charming. What doesn’t help is that the film has a bit of a made-for-TV attitude towards sexual content (Also, Nanette Newman apparently uses a body double for her very brief nude scene, so it’s even more useless). Veteran character actor Harry Andrews is rock-solid, but underused (Clive Swift even more poorly used). He and Haigh are too good for this.

 

Every once in a while I’ll come across a film that makes perfect narrative sense, but I still can’t make heads or tails of it. This is one such film. I couldn’t work out why I was supposed to care about any of it. The drug/suicide thing feels like it should be the important thing here, but if it is, the film takes forever to get around to really dealing with it and what we get instead just isn’t compelling. Americans would take the same basic plot and turn it into an industrial thriller, but because it’s British…we mostly get stuffy class bullshit and fox hunting. And John Quentin, who I’m pretty sure is Benedict Cumberbatch’s dad. Or not. I might be joking about that.

 

Presumably popular in England at the time, but so was the “Carry On” series. There’s no accounting for taste. This one did very little for me. Well-acted, but who cares? Not me. Much ado about less than nothing.

 

Rating: C-

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Review: Hellraiser (2022)

Recovering junkie Odessa A’zion accompanies scuzzy boyfriend Drew Starkey on a break-in where all they find is a weird puzzle box. A’zion later opens the box and after some weird shit happens, A’zion and Starkey figure it might be a good idea to learn more about this messed up trinket. Goran Visnjic plays a millionaire who possessed the box before our protagonist nicked it.   Is there any point in remaking/rebooting “Hellraiser” when the 1987 adaptation of Clive Barker’s original text was written and directed by Barker himself? And is considered a horror classic? On evidence here, absolutely not. Directed by David Bruckner ( “The Signal” ) and scripted by Ben Collins ( “The Night House” ) and Luke Piotrowski (ditto) this is an entirely tedious affair. I took a long time to get on board with the 1987 “Hellraiser” , I have to admit. It was wildly imaginative and original, like a nightmare transplanted on to film. However, the characters were stone cold and left me similarly chilly t
Read more

Review: Boyka: Undisputed

Yuri Boyka (Scott Adkins) is out of prison and fighting for a living, with ambitions for the ‘Most Complete Fighter’ to make a real name for himself. However, after an opponent dies during a fight, the deeply religious Boyka starts to have a crisis of conscience. He tries to make amends with the man’s widow, which eventually pits him against a local gangster (Alon Moni Aboutboul, quite good). Anything with Scott Adkins will generally get me interested, and although this series peaked with the superlative “Undisputed II: Last Man Standing” , this 2017 film from director Todor Chapkanov (director of the SyFy movies “Copperhead” and “Ghost Town” ) is no slouch in a series yet to deliver anything less than solid entertainment. Producer Isaac Florentine is missed in the director’s chair, but Chapkanov gives us at the very least the series’ most dramatically ambitious entry, as Adkins’ ‘most complete fighter’ Yuri Boyka continues on his journey to redemption here. In this one, the
Read more

Review: Ninja 2: Shadow of a Tear

Scott Adkins is once again Casey, an American proponent of the martial art of Ninjutsu. When Casey’s pregnant Japanese wife (Mika Hijii) is rubbed out, he’s on a vengeance mission to find her killers. A friendly face, Nakabara (Kane Kosugi) turns up at the funeral, and suggests Casey come to Thailand to deal with his grief in another country. Casey initially declines, but eventually takes Nakabara up on his offer. However, his wife’s murder still haunts Casey, and with intel supplied by Nakabara, the trail eventually leads Casey to a brutal drug baron named Goro (Shun Sugata).   I was extremely disappointed with the first “Ninja” , but had heard that this 2013 sequel from director Isaac Florentine ( “Undisputed II: Last Man Standing” , “Undisputed III: Redemption” , “Ninja” ) was a damn near masterpiece of the martial-arts action movie genre. Having now finally gotten my hot little hands on it, I’d say the hype is a bit much, but this is unquestionably a much better film than the f
Read more